Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMolz, F. J.
dc.contributor.authorMelville, J. G.
dc.contributor.authorParr, Alfred D.
dc.contributor.authorKing, D. A.
dc.contributor.authorHopf, M. T.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-17T15:19:17Z
dc.date.available2015-11-17T15:19:17Z
dc.date.issued1983-02
dc.identifier.citationMolz, F. J., J. G. Melville, A. D. Parr, D. A. King, and M. T. Hopf. "Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage : A Well Doublet Experiment at Increased Temperatures." Water Resources Research Water Resour. Res. 19.1 (1983): 149-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR019i001p00149en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/18923
dc.descriptionThis is the published version. Copyright 1983 American Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.description.abstractThe two main objectives of this communication are to present a study of potential advantages and disadvantages of the doublet supply-injection well configuration in an aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) system and to report on aquifer storage problems with injection temperatures in the 80°C range. A 3-month injection-storage-recovery cycle followed by a 7.3-month cycle constituted the main experiment. The injection volumes were 25,402 m3 and 58,063 m3 at average temperatures of 58.5°C and 81°C respectively. Unlikely previous experiments at the Mobile site, no clogging of the injection well due to clay particle swelling, dispersion, and migration was observed. This is attributed to the fact that the supply water used for injection contained a cation concentration equal to or slightly greater than that in the native groundwater. For cycles I and II, the fraction of injected energy recovered in a volume of water equal to the injection volume was 0.56 and 0.45 respectively. Both groundwater temperature and tracer data support the conclusion that this relatively low recovery was due to the detrimental effects of free thermal convection, possibly augmented by longitudinal zones of high permeability. Construction of a partially penetrating recovery well improved recovery efficiency but is not thought to be an adequate solution to thermal stratification. A maximum increase of 1.24 cm in relative land surface elevation was recorded near the end of second cycle injection. The engineering implications of such an elevation change would have to be considered, especially if an ATES system were being designed in an urban environment. A third cycle was started at the Mobile site on April 7, 1982. This final experiment contains a partially penetrating, dual-recovery well system which is expected to maximize energy recovery from a thermally stratified storage aquifer.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.titleAquifer thermal energy storage : A well doublet experiment at increased temperaturesen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorParr, Alfred D.
kusw.kudepartmentCivil/Environ/Arch Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/WR019i001p00149
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record