Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHines, Laura J.
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-01T15:19:27Z
dc.date.available2011-06-01T15:19:27Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationLaura J. Hines, The Dangerous Allure of the Issue Class Action, 79 Indiana Law Journal 567-610 (2004).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7577
dc.description.abstractIn the complex and chaotic world of mass torts, a class action that aggregates the claims of aggrieved individuals against a common defendant would seem not only a prudent solution, but possibly even a necessary one. The class device holds out the promise of resolving issues "common" to all plaintiffs in a single trial, preventing wasteful and repetitive litigation of similar issues, and the possibility of inconsistent results. And collective adjudication allows plaintiffs to pool resources against better-financed defendants. Despite these potential benefits and the admiration of a host of commentators, however, the class action has thus far failed to gain significant judicial acceptance as a fair and efficient mechanism for resolving mass tort claims. Indeed, the Supreme Court in recent years struck down two wide-reaching mass tort class actions in such sweeping terms that many observers predicted the death of the mass tort class action. [...]
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIndiana University Maurer School of Law
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1856331
dc.titleThe Dangerous Allure of the Issue Class Action
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorHines, Laura J.
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record