The Dangerous Allure of the Issue Class Action

View/ Open
Issue Date
2004Author
Hines, Laura J.
Publisher
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Version
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1856331
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In the complex and chaotic world of mass torts, a class action that aggregates the claims of aggrieved individuals against a common defendant would seem not only a prudent solution, but possibly even a necessary one. The class device holds out the promise of resolving issues "common" to all plaintiffs in a single trial, preventing wasteful and repetitive litigation of similar issues, and the possibility of inconsistent results. And collective adjudication allows plaintiffs to pool resources against better-financed defendants. Despite these potential benefits and the admiration of a host of commentators, however, the class action has thus far failed to gain significant judicial acceptance as a fair and efficient mechanism for resolving mass tort claims. Indeed, the Supreme Court in recent years struck down two wide-reaching mass tort class actions in such sweeping terms that many observers predicted the death of the mass tort class action. [...]
Collections
Citation
Laura J. Hines, The Dangerous Allure of the Issue Class Action, 79 Indiana Law Journal 567-610 (2004).
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.