Consumer Arbitration As Exceptional Consumer Law (With A Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen)
Issue Date
1998Author
Ware, Stephen J.
Publisher
Pacific McGeorge School of Law
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article is part of a symposium on arbitration held by the McGeorge School of Law. It replies to an article co- authored by Paul Carrington, the keynote speaker for the symposium. See Paul Carrington and Paul Haagen, Contract and Jurisdiction, 1996 Sup. Ct. Rev. 331. Carrington and Haagen, like many commentators, criticize recent Supreme Court decisions on arbitration law and the contractual approach underlying those decisions. This article defends the contractual approach.
Collections
Citation
Stephen J. Ware, Consumer Arbitration As Exceptional Consumer Law (With A Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen), 29 McGeorge Law Review 195-221 (1998).
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.