Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWare, Stephen J.
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-08T14:16:44Z
dc.date.available2011-04-08T14:16:44Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationStephen J. Ware, Consumer Arbitration As Exceptional Consumer Law (With A Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen), 29 McGeorge Law Review 195-221 (1998).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7366
dc.description.abstractThis article is part of a symposium on arbitration held by the McGeorge School of Law. It replies to an article co- authored by Paul Carrington, the keynote speaker for the symposium. See Paul Carrington and Paul Haagen, Contract and Jurisdiction, 1996 Sup. Ct. Rev. 331. Carrington and Haagen, like many commentators, criticize recent Supreme Court decisions on arbitration law and the contractual approach underlying those decisions. This article defends the contractual approach.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPacific McGeorge School of Law
dc.subjectArbitration
dc.subjectConsumers
dc.titleConsumer Arbitration As Exceptional Consumer Law (With A Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen)
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorWare, Stephen J.
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record