ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Consumer Arbitration As Exceptional Consumer Law (With A Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen)
| dc.contributor.author | Ware, Stephen J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-08T14:16:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-04-08T14:16:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1998 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Stephen J. Ware, Consumer Arbitration As Exceptional Consumer Law (With A Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen), 29 McGeorge Law Review 195-221 (1998). | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/7366 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article is part of a symposium on arbitration held by the McGeorge School of Law. It replies to an article co- authored by Paul Carrington, the keynote speaker for the symposium. See Paul Carrington and Paul Haagen, Contract and Jurisdiction, 1996 Sup. Ct. Rev. 331. Carrington and Haagen, like many commentators, criticize recent Supreme Court decisions on arbitration law and the contractual approach underlying those decisions. This article defends the contractual approach. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Pacific McGeorge School of Law | |
| dc.subject | Arbitration | |
| dc.subject | Consumers | |
| dc.title | Consumer Arbitration As Exceptional Consumer Law (With A Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen) | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| kusw.kuauthor | Ware, Stephen J. | |
| kusw.kudepartment | Law | |
| kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
| kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
| kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |
