ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Demand driven acquisitions in academic libraries: A scoping review
dc.contributor.author | Monroe-Gulick, Amalia | |
dc.contributor.author | Back, Andi | |
dc.contributor.author | Geiger Wolfe, Gwen | |
dc.contributor.author | Outhier, Sara | |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, Sara E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-22T19:22:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-22T19:22:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Monroe-Gulick, A., Back, A., Geiger Wolfe, G., Outhier, S., & Morris, S.E. (2024). Demand driven acquisitions in academic libraries: A scoping review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102862 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1808/34970 | |
dc.description.abstract | Demand driven acquisitions (DDA) have become commonplace in academic libraries, but little is known about how they are assessed. This scoping review provides a comprehensive study of print and electronic monographic DDA programs at academic libraries. The review includes an examination of the definition of DDA programs, methodological approaches, and the impact of DDA programs on established library collections. The research team's goals include outlining the current discourse on DDA and identifying gaps in the existing literature, as well as examining the potential for standardization within the profession regarding DDA terminology and definitions. Of 1758 records, 48 publications were identified for inclusion. Analysis of the included publications revealed most studies examined electronic DDA programs that were considered pilots. Overwhelmingly, the literature studied aspects of return on investment, circulation, and use. More subject points of investigation such as evaluation of materials, satisfaction of users or librarians, and quality were less studied. Further research on aspects of print DDA, how the COVID-19 Pandemic affected DDA, and more recently growing acquisition methods such as evidence-based acquisitions are needed. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject | Collection development | en_US |
dc.subject | Demand driven acquisitions | en_US |
dc.subject | Scoping review | en_US |
dc.subject | Academic libraries | en_US |
dc.title | Demand driven acquisitions in academic libraries: A scoping review | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Monroe-Gulick, Amalia | |
kusw.kuauthor | Back, Andi | |
kusw.kuauthor | Geiger Wolfe, Gwen | |
kusw.kuauthor | Outhier, Sara | |
kusw.kuauthor | Morris, Sara E. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Libraries | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102862 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2542-4339 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-8972 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3309-2488 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5751-018X | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-8615 | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | en_US |