dc.contributor.author | Boginskaya, Olga | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-24T18:20:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-24T18:20:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Boginskaya O. (2022). Popularisation of medical knowledge in online forums. Slavia Centralis, 15(1), 42–57. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/slaviacentralis/article/view/1842 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/33914 | |
dc.description.abstract | Članek raziskuje ruski poljudnoznanstveni medicinski diskurz, in sicer z vidika popularizacijskih strategij, ki se uporabljajo v interakciji med strokovnjakom in laikom. Pri tem je treba strokovno znanje približati nestrokovnjaku na način, ki mu omogoča razumevanje. Raziskava je nastala zaradi opažanj o pomanjkanju jasnih smernic za interakcijo strokovnjakov z laiki (uporabniki spleta) in zaradi izzivov, s katerimi se nestrokovna publika sooča pri poskusih razumevanja abstraktnih in/ali neznanih medicinskih konceptov. Ugotovitve podpirajo izhodiščno tezo, da strokovnjaki pri komuniciranju z nestrokovnjaki uporabljajo drugačno retoriko, razlagalne strategije pa jim pomagajo interpretirati strokovno vsebino. V članku so prikazane strategije, ki se uporabljajo za razlago strokovnih konceptov nestrokovnjakom.The article investigates Russian popular medical science discourse which has barely been studied in terms of popularisation strategies used in expertlay interaction where a set of specialised concepts needs to be displayed in a way that enables a lay audience to understand them. The study was, thus, motivated by the lack of guidance for interacting with non-expert lay Internet users, and challenges faced by them in attempting to understand unfamiliar medical concepts. The findings support the study’s central argument that experts use a different rhetoric to communicate with a lay audience than they use with their peers, and the explanatory strategies help them to overcome the incomprehensibility of expert discourse, indicating that efforts should be undertaken to explain specialised concepts to non-experts. | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Maribor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://journals.um.si/index.php/slaviacentralis/article/view/1842 | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2022 University of Maribor Press. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject | Pojasnjevalna strategija | en_US |
dc.subject | Asimetrija znanja | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicinski diskurz | en_US |
dc.subject | Populariziran diskurz | en_US |
dc.subject | Explanatory strategy | en_US |
dc.subject | Knowledge asymmetry | en_US |
dc.subject | Medical discourse | en_US |
dc.subject | Popularised discourse | en_US |
dc.title | Popularisation of medical knowledge in online forums | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.oanotes | Per Sherpa Romeo 02/24/2023:Slavia Centralis
[Open panel below]Publication Information
TitleSlavia Centralis (SCN) [Slovene]
ISSNsElectronic: 1855-6302
URLhttps://journals.um.si/index.php/slaviacentralis/about
Publishers
Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru [University Publisher]
University of Kansas [University Publisher]
DOAJ Listinghttps://doaj.org/toc/1855-6302
Requires APCNo [Data provided by DOAJ]
[Open panel below]Publisher Policy
Open Access pathways permitted by this journal's policy are listed below by article version. Click on a pathway for a more detailed view.Published Version
NoneCC BY-NC
Institutional Repository, Institutional Website, Author's Homepage, +1
OA PublishingThis pathway includes Open Access publishing
EmbargoNo Embargo
LicenceCC BY-NC 4.0
Copyright OwnerAuthors
Location
Author's Homepage
Institutional Repository
Institutional Website
Journal Website
ConditionsPublished source must be acknowledged | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | en_US |