Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMonroe-Gulick, Amalia
dc.contributor.authorSchleuder, Marla
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T17:43:52Z
dc.date.available2022-06-01T17:43:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMonroe-Gulick, Amalia and Schleuder, Marla. "Tools for Determining Equitable Representation of Women in LIS Publications," in the Proceedings of the 2020–2021 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, October 29, 2020–March 17, 2021, virtual conference, ed. Sue Baughman, Jackie Belanger, Emery Durnan, Elizabeth Edwards, Martha Kyrillidou, Klara Maidenberg, Angela Pappalardo, and Maurini Strub (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 2021).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/32768
dc.description.abstractLibrarianship has long been viewed as a “pink collar” profession, meaning a predominantly female profession. Such a gendered distinction still holds true when it is broken down into sub-fields such as academic and public librarianship. However, the stark gender differences do lessen in the field of academic librarianship when compared to public librarianship, similar to k-12 education and higher education. A 2017 article “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science” inspired this current study because we wanted to know if there was a similar gender gap in publication in this female dominated profession as there was in a male dominated profession. At a technical level, we show how data can be pulled from a database using an API, and cleaned and transformed into a usable tabular format, using open source tools. More broadly, we show how data can be obtained from published sources and extrapolated to fill in gaps which would not otherwise be obtainable, such as demographic data, which can then be assessed and analyzed. The results show women authorship is not proportional to the gender make-up of the profession as whole. But if overall, if equity in representation is the goal, more women need to be published in these journals, and potentially LIS research publishing as a whole.en_US
dc.publisherAssociation of Research Librariesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.libraryassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/343-Monroe-Gulick-Tools-for-Determining.pdfen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.libraryassessment.org/presenters/paper-guidelines/copyright-agreement/en_US
dc.subjectAcademic libraries
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectPublishing
dc.subjectLibrary and information science
dc.subjectCitation analysis
dc.titleTools for Determining Equitable Representation of Women in LIS Publicationsen_US
dc.typeConference proceedingen_US
kusw.kuauthorMonroe-Gulick, Amalia
kusw.kuauthorSchleuder, Marla
kusw.kudepartmentLibrariesen_US
kusw.kudepartmentDole Institute of Politicsen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2542-4339en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9020-4781en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record