Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhala, Raj
dc.contributor.authorCody, Wood
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-22T14:43:57Z
dc.date.available2019-04-22T14:43:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citation47 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. Len_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/27757
dc.description.abstractWhat should free trade agreements (FTAs) say about gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity? No longer is “nothing” the only answer. The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for a Trans Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) now discuss the rights of women and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, and Other (LGBTQ+) persons. They do so in Articles 23.4 and 23.9, respectively. But, these provisions are soft law.

These Articles ought to be strengthened to advance women’s and LGBTQ+ rights. That is, we argue gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity should be effectively addressed through hard law legal structures using hard law language that incorporates empirical insights.
en_US
dc.publisherGeorgia Journal of International and Comparative Lawen_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3376051en_US
dc.subjectFree trade agreementsen_US
dc.subjectFTA
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectSexual orientation
dc.subjectComprehensive and Progressive Agreement for a Trans Pacific Partnership
dc.subjectCPTPP
dc.subjectUnited States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
dc.subjectUSMCA
dc.subjectWomen
dc.subjectLGBTQ
dc.titleTwo Dimensional Hard-Soft Law Theory and the Advancement of Women's and LGBTQ+ Rights Through Free Trade Agreementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorBhala, Raj
kusw.kudepartmentLawen_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record