Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuggard, Marcella
dc.contributor.authorUglean Jackson, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T19:49:02Z
dc.date.available2018-10-23T19:49:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-01
dc.identifier.citationHuggard, Marcella and Laura Uglean Jackson. “Reappraisal and Deaccessioning Practices in the United States and Canada (Dataset)." October 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/26973
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/26973
dc.descriptionThis survey studied reappraisal and deaccessioning in archival repositories in the United States and Canada. See the README file in this record for a complete description of the files in this dataset.

Note: The survey questions from both surveys are being made available in both text and PDF formats, as the PDF provides the same questions as the text file, but with formatting that makes them easier to read.

Raw data was exported directly from the survey platform, Qualtrics. The principle investigators removed in both sets of raw data IP addresses, location latitude and longitude information, names, emails, and other contact information, and other identifying information to maintain anonymity of survey participants. They also deleted empty (blank) columns (for example, recipient email address) for improved formatting. If respondents included information that might have identified them in open-ended comments, the principle investigators removed only this information, placing [REDACTED FOR ANONYMITY] in its place, in order to preserve as much of the original comment as possible.
en_US
dc.description.abstractThe objectives for this study were multifold: To learn how repositories conduct reappraisal and deaccessioning, including the processes involved; To learn how common these practices are and which types of repositories reappraise or deaccession, and which do not; To better understand how the archives profession perceives reappraisal and deaccessioning; To learn why repositories reappraise or deaccession and why they do not; To better understand effects on donor relations.

Additionally, the survey sought to generate quantitative data about transparency regarding deaccessioning decisions and disposition of deaccessioned materials. The survey asked about the existence of institutional reappraisal and deaccessioning policies; the impact of the Society of American Archivists (SAA) Guidelines, approved by SAA in 2012, and whether the existence of these guidelines has created an uptick in the practices of reappraisal and deaccessioning; and benefits and negative effects of reappraising and deaccessioning.
en_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2018 Marcella Huggard and Laura Uglean Jackson. This dataset is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectArchivesen_US
dc.subjectReappraisalen_US
dc.subjectDeaccessioningen_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.subjectBorn digital
dc.titleReappraisal and Deaccessioning Practices in the United States and Canada (Dataset)en_US
dc.typeDataseten_US
kusw.kuauthorHuggard, Marcella
kusw.kudepartmentLibrariesen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4399-9179en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-9947
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2018 Marcella Huggard and Laura Uglean Jackson.  This dataset is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Copyright 2018 Marcella Huggard and Laura Uglean Jackson. This dataset is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.