Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKundrotas, Petras J.
dc.contributor.authorVasker, Ilya A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-30T15:36:04Z
dc.date.available2017-03-30T15:36:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationKundrotas, P. J., & Vakser, I. A. (2013). Global and local structural similarity in protein–protein complexes: Implications for template-based docking. Proteins, 81(12), 2137–2142. http://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24392en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/23519
dc.description.abstractThe increasing amount of structural information on protein–protein interactions makes it possible to predict the structure of protein–protein complexes by comparison/alignment of the interacting proteins to the ones in cocrystallized complexes. In the predictions based on structure similarity, the template search is performed by structural alignment of the target interactors with the entire structures or with the interface only of the subunits in cocrystallized complexes. This study investigates the scope of the structural similarity that facilitates the detection of a broad range of templates significantly divergent from the targets. The analysis of the target-template similarity is based on models of protein–protein complexes in a large representative set of heterodimers. The similarity of the biological and crystal packing interfaces, dissimilar interface structural motifs in overall similar structures, interface similarity to the full structure, and local similarity away from the interface were analyzed. The structural similarity at the protein–protein interfaces only was observed in ~25% of target-template pairs with sequence identity <20% and primarily homodimeric templates. For ~50% of the target-template pairs, the similarity at the interface was accompanied by the similarity of the whole structure. However, the structural similarity at the interfaces was still stronger than that of the noninterface parts. The study provides insights into structural and functional diversity of protein–protein complexes, and relative performance of the interface and full structure alignment in docking.en_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Proteins, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.24392. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.en_US
dc.subjectProtein recognitionen_US
dc.subjectProtein modelingen_US
dc.subjectBioinformaticsen_US
dc.subjectStructure predictionen_US
dc.subjectStructural templatesen_US
dc.titleGlobal and local structural similarity in protein–protein complexes: Implications for template-based dockingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorKundrotas, Petras J.
kusw.kuauthorVakser, Ilya A.
kusw.kudepartmentMolecular Biosciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/prot.24392en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record