Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKundrotas, Petras J.
dc.contributor.authorVasker, Ilya A.
dc.identifier.citationKundrotas, P. J., & Vakser, I. A. (2013). Global and local structural similarity in protein–protein complexes: Implications for template-based docking. Proteins, 81(12), 2137–2142.
dc.description.abstractThe increasing amount of structural information on protein–protein interactions makes it possible to predict the structure of protein–protein complexes by comparison/alignment of the interacting proteins to the ones in cocrystallized complexes. In the predictions based on structure similarity, the template search is performed by structural alignment of the target interactors with the entire structures or with the interface only of the subunits in cocrystallized complexes. This study investigates the scope of the structural similarity that facilitates the detection of a broad range of templates significantly divergent from the targets. The analysis of the target-template similarity is based on models of protein–protein complexes in a large representative set of heterodimers. The similarity of the biological and crystal packing interfaces, dissimilar interface structural motifs in overall similar structures, interface similarity to the full structure, and local similarity away from the interface were analyzed. The structural similarity at the protein–protein interfaces only was observed in ~25% of target-template pairs with sequence identity <20% and primarily homodimeric templates. For ~50% of the target-template pairs, the similarity at the interface was accompanied by the similarity of the whole structure. However, the structural similarity at the interfaces was still stronger than that of the noninterface parts. The study provides insights into structural and functional diversity of protein–protein complexes, and relative performance of the interface and full structure alignment in docking.en_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Proteins, which has been published in final form at This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.en_US
dc.subjectProtein recognitionen_US
dc.subjectProtein modelingen_US
dc.subjectStructure predictionen_US
dc.subjectStructural templatesen_US
dc.titleGlobal and local structural similarity in protein–protein complexes: Implications for template-based dockingen_US
kusw.kuauthorKundrotas, Petras J.
kusw.kuauthorVakser, Ilya A.
kusw.kudepartmentMolecular Biosciencesen_US
kusw.oanotesPer SHERPA/RoMEO 3/30/2017: Author's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) Author's Post-print: grey tick subject to Restrictions below, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) Restrictions:

12 months embargo

Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF General Conditions:

Some journals have separate policies, please check with each journal directly On author's personal website, institutional repositories, arXiv, AgEcon, PhilPapers, PubMed Central, RePEc or Social Science Research Network Author's pre-print may not be updated with Publisher's Version/PDF Author's pre-print must acknowledge acceptance for publication Non-Commercial Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used Publisher source must be acknowledged with citation Must link to publisher version with set statement (see policy) If OnlineOpen is available, BBSRC, EPSRC, MRC, NERC and STFC authors, may self-archive after 12 months
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record