Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRadio, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-25T15:13:51Z
dc.date.available2016-01-25T15:13:51Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/19793
dc.descriptionThis is an electronic version of an article published in Cataloging and Classification Quarterly. This article is available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01639374.2015.1133750en_US
dc.description.abstractMetadata auditing is a common practice used to assess quality by drawing on a selection of documents to create a representative sample of the corpus. This article examines common techniques involved in auditing and argues that underlying semiotic principles should be considered before remediation and transformation work are undertaken. This article provides an inquiry into the structural nature of metadata, records, and corpora to analyze the semiotic processes and boundaries that can affect audits. Suggestions for effective auditing practices are offered as well as what can be obfuscated when transformations are undertaken without concern for the sign-functions of metadata.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.subjectSemioticsen_US
dc.subjectMetadataen_US
dc.subjectQuality metricsen_US
dc.titleSemiotic Principles for Metadata Auditing and Evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorRadio, Erik
kusw.kudepartmentLibrariesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01639374.2015.1133750
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0734-1978en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record