Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhite, Monica
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-02T20:11:08Z
dc.date.available2009-07-02T20:11:08Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-02en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2271/751en_US
dc.description.abstractHIV testing is now placed under the general consent to treat. What is not clear are the cost and consequences that accompany these CDC recommendations (Holtgrave, 2007). Written informed consent promotes patient information and awareness, while protecting patients and physicians; omitting counseling and disclosures may eliminate patient education about HIV and high risk behaviors (Donoghoe, Lane, & Wolf, 2007). The ethical issue with routine testing is the elimination of HIV test specific written consent and pretest counseling. The lack of adequate information related to patients rights to refuse testing along with the risks and benefits are also ethical concerns. Routine testing may be met with barriers from individual states. Most states have pretest counseling incorporated in their HIV testing laws (Donoghoe, Lane, & Wolf, 2007). Opt-out testing may come with consequences such as failure to reduce high risk behavior (Holtgrave, 2007).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleEthical Concerns with Opt-Out Testing in Comparison to Voluntary Counseling Testingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subject.cinahlEthics, Medicalen_US
dc.subject.cinahlConsenten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record