Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFriesen, Kelsey
dc.contributor.editorMartin, David
dc.contributor.editorGodfrey, Nelda
dc.coverage.temporalFall 2012 - Spring 2013en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-28T20:55:47Z
dc.date.available2013-06-28T20:55:47Z
dc.date.created2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2271/1170en_US
dc.descriptionAbout the author: Kelsey Friesen lives in Lake Quivira, Kansas. While at the School of Nursing she received the School of Nursing and the Arthur S and Leora J. Peck Scholarships. She received honorable mention for clinical excellence in Level I. She is a member of Delta Chapter of Sigma Theta Tau International. She plans to start her career in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at Childrens Mercy Hospital in Kansas City Missouri. Her future plans are to become very good at her new role and then seek a doctorate in nursing practice as a pediatric nurse practitioner. She thanks her family for their continued support and guidance.
dc.description.abstractOne of the Healthy People 2020 objectives is to “reduce violence by current or former intimate partners” (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2011, p. 16). Several health organizations such as the American Medical Association, American Nurses Association and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing have recommended routine screening for IPV. This is due to the many negative health associations with intimate partner violence (IPV). About one fourth of women and one ninth of men over age 18 in the United States have experienced IPV (Centers for Disease Control, 2008). Approximately 15% of adults in the United States report having been a victim of IPV and three-fifths of adults report knowing someone who has been a victim of IPV (Krane, 2006). Currently there is no standard screening tool or protocol to help identify victims of this abuse and screening is consistently not being done. The purpose of this paper is to outline the lack of screening for IPV in spite of its prevalence and adverse health effects, the barriers that hinder screening, if all of those barriers are well founded, and ways to increase screening. This will ultimately inform healthcare providers about the ethical dilemma at hand and the need to increase IPV screening in future practice.
dc.description.sponsorshipUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF NURSING BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN NURSING PROGRAM AND DELTA CHAPTER OF SIGMA THETA INTERNATIONAL
dc.description.tableofcontentsEditorial. Closer Look at Visitation Hour Policies in Intensive Care Units -- Banh, M. Expanding Donor Criteria: Is it Safe? -- Barkman, A. Intimate Partner Violence Screening: A Nursing Concern? -- Friesen, K. Taking the Guess Out of the Gender Game: Ethical Issues in Pre-Conception Sex Selection -- McShane, F. Let's Talk About Sex -- Mikulan, K. Legal and Ethical Issues Concerning Pro_Life Choices -- O'Malley, C. Medical Marijuana: The Legal and Clinical Facts Regarding Medical Use -- Ramsey, A. The Benefits of Psychedelic Drug Application for Clinical Treatment of Mental Illness -- Shumate, T. Ethical Issues of Children as Research Subjects -- Truong, M. N.
dc.format.extent11 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDomestic Violence
dc.titleIntimate Partner Violence Screening: A Nursing Concern?
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record