KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparisons of Two Different Analytical Methodologies for the Characterization of Sub-Visible Particles in Therapeutic Protein Formulations

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Frommknecht_ku_0099M_11894_DATA_1.pdf (9.183Mb)
    Issue Date
    2011-12-31
    Author
    Frommknecht, Tobias
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    75 pages
    Type
    Thesis
    Degree Level
    M.S.
    Discipline
    Pharmaceutical Chemistry
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The US and EU pharmacopeias require sub-visible particle (SbVP) testing of parenteral drug products by either light obscuration (LO) or light microscopy. According to the USP/EP, the LO method requires the use of four measurements consuming a total volume of 25 ml per sample. This large sample volume makes the compendia test not only cost-intensive for biopharmaceutics, but in certain cases impractical, especially in early stage development when clinical supplies are often limited. The first part of this work therefore presents a set of experimental data for evaluation of a small scale, lower volume LO method (1.2 ml per sample). Limitations for detecting various translucent particles such as glass splinters, silicone oil droplets and non-soluble protein aggregates have been considered for both of these LO methods. In addition, a relatively new technology - Micro Flow Digital Imaging (MDI) - has been introduced, which may be a viable add-on to measure SbVP. The purpose of the second phase of this research was to evaluate the advantages and limitations of MDI by directly comparing LO and MDI, and also by comparing two different MDI instruments (i.e., Micro Flow Imaging (MFI) and FlowCam), with regards to subvisible particle counts, size distribution and morphology parameter analysis. As protein subvisible particles vary widely in shape and size, it is difficult to quantitatively describe the limitations of MDI and LO for actual samples of a protein therapeutic drug. Moreover, real-life protein formulations can differ in optical properties such as turbidity, color, refractive index which may potentially influence SbVP detection. During this work, MDI technologies have been improved for the use on a routine basis with protein samples (e.g., FlowCam counting ability was improved by adding a syringe pump for controlled flow, and MFI optical system was enhanced with the so called set-point 3). The effect of solution optical properties on SbVP particle sizing and counting was addressed subsequently using the latest MDI instrument and three different LO instruments. In addition, translucent particles such as glass and irregular shaped particles in development as "false protein standard" (to mimic properties of real life proteinaceous particles) were evaluated in this work.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/9784
    Collections
    • Pharmaceutical Chemistry Dissertations and Theses [141]
    • Theses [3828]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps