KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    (In)visibility of Black women: Drawing attention to individuality

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Sesko_ku_0099D_11609_DATA_1.pdf (848.4Kb)
    Issue Date
    2011-08-31
    Author
    Sesko, Amanda Kate
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    84 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Psychology
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Invisibility is defined as a lack of individuation of or lack of differentiation between group members, and is evident in poor recognition of individual faces. The current work tests the hypothesis that the non-prototypicality of Black women's race and gender results in their ``invisibility" relative to White women and Black and White men. Studies 1 and 2 hypothesized that invisibility would be highest when Black women were depicted as non-prototypical of their race and/or gender groups, but reduced when more prototypical of the group "women" and/or "Black." To manipulate prototypicality, Study 1 varied the numerical representation of Black women within the group "women" to be low (10 out of 80 photos in an array) or equal relative to White women, and Study 2 varied the trait overlap of Black women to be low (25%) or high (75%) relative to White women and/or Black men. Invisibility was measured by a subsequent face recognition task. Rather than invisibility being reduced under conditions of equal numerical representation and high trait overlap, the direct opposite occurred: Low numerical representation and low trait overlap increased recognition of faces. Studies 3 and 4 tested alternative explanations. Study 3 addressed the possibility that the women in Study 1 looked powerful by manipulating perceived power of the women in the photo array (labeled as "secretaries" or "managers"). There was no evidence that power played a role. Study 4 tested the hypothesis that Studies 1 and 2 primed a focus on how Black women are different or unique compared to White women and Black men in the low numerical representation and trait overlap conditions. As predicted, participants who were procedurally primed to focus on similarities were worse at recognizing Black women in a subsequent face recognition task. This effect was attenuated among participants who were procedurally primed to focus on differences. Mirroring the results of Study 1 and 2, Study 4 suggested a difference focus can lead to a reduction in use of category based information and an increased use of individuating information, reducing invisibility. Implications for reduction of invisibility are discussed.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/8199
    Collections
    • Dissertations [4475]
    • Psychology Dissertations and Theses [459]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps