ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBiernat, Monica
dc.contributor.authorSesko, Amanda Kate
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-09T15:12:21Z
dc.date.available2011-10-09T15:12:21Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-31
dc.date.submitted2011
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:11609
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/8199
dc.description.abstractInvisibility is defined as a lack of individuation of or lack of differentiation between group members, and is evident in poor recognition of individual faces. The current work tests the hypothesis that the non-prototypicality of Black women's race and gender results in their ``invisibility" relative to White women and Black and White men. Studies 1 and 2 hypothesized that invisibility would be highest when Black women were depicted as non-prototypical of their race and/or gender groups, but reduced when more prototypical of the group "women" and/or "Black." To manipulate prototypicality, Study 1 varied the numerical representation of Black women within the group "women" to be low (10 out of 80 photos in an array) or equal relative to White women, and Study 2 varied the trait overlap of Black women to be low (25%) or high (75%) relative to White women and/or Black men. Invisibility was measured by a subsequent face recognition task. Rather than invisibility being reduced under conditions of equal numerical representation and high trait overlap, the direct opposite occurred: Low numerical representation and low trait overlap increased recognition of faces. Studies 3 and 4 tested alternative explanations. Study 3 addressed the possibility that the women in Study 1 looked powerful by manipulating perceived power of the women in the photo array (labeled as "secretaries" or "managers"). There was no evidence that power played a role. Study 4 tested the hypothesis that Studies 1 and 2 primed a focus on how Black women are different or unique compared to White women and Black men in the low numerical representation and trait overlap conditions. As predicted, participants who were procedurally primed to focus on similarities were worse at recognizing Black women in a subsequent face recognition task. This effect was attenuated among participants who were procedurally primed to focus on differences. Mirroring the results of Study 1 and 2, Study 4 suggested a difference focus can lead to a reduction in use of category based information and an increased use of individuating information, reducing invisibility. Implications for reduction of invisibility are discussed.
dc.format.extent84 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectSocial psychology
dc.subjectDiscrimination
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectInvisibility
dc.subjectRace
dc.subjectSocial judgment
dc.subjectStereotypes
dc.title(In)visibility of Black women: Drawing attention to individuality
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberCrandall, Christian S.
dc.contributor.cmtememberMolina, Ludwin
dc.contributor.cmtememberLandau, Mark
dc.contributor.cmtememberPatterson, Meagan
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplinePsychology
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid7643075
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record