Imperfect enforcement, foreign investment, and foreign aid

View/ Open
Issue Date
2002-09Author
Asiedu, Elizabeth
Villamil, Anne P.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Format
146101 bytes
Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The lack of a supranational legal authority that can enforce private contracts across borders makes debt repayment in an international setting contingent on borrowers' willingness to pay rather than ability to pay. This market failure (i.e., inadequate enforcement) causes investment to fall short of its unconstrained level. This paper examines how foreign aid affects a country's willingness to honor private investment agreements. We consider two types of aid: technical assistance and loan subsidies. We show that when enforcement is inadequate, aid has the following effects: (i) it reduces default risk, promotes capital flows, and can, in principle, restore investment to its unconstrained level; (ii) when default risk is high, aid can increase the welfare of both the recipient and the donor country. Thus, foreign aid serves as an enforcement mechanism in an international setting. This provides a nonaltruistic rationale for foreign aid. Finally, we discuss the implications of providing bilateral versus multilateral aid (e.g., by individual countries versus multilateral organizations).
Collections
Citation
Asiedu, Elizabeth; Villamil, AP. Imperfect enforcement, foreign investment, and foreign aid. Macroeconomic Dynamics. Sep 2002. 6(4) : 476-495.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.