dc.contributor.author | Ware, Stephen J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-28T21:47:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-28T21:47:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Stephen J. Ware, What Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration?, 76 University of Cincinnati Law Review 447-457 (2008). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/7451 | |
dc.description.abstract | This short piece emphasizes what makes consumer and employment arbitration in the securities industry different from consumer and employment arbitration generally. Securities law imposes non-contractual duties to arbitrate on both broker-dealers and securities employees. I believe these laws are bad policy because they restrict contractual freedom. I conclude that securities arbitration should be contractual, like other arbitration. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | University of Cincinnati College of Law | |
dc.relation.hasversion | http://ssrn.com/abstract=1118125 | |
dc.subject | Arbitration | |
dc.subject | Securities law | |
dc.title | What Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration? | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Ware, Stephen J. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Law | |
kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |