ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWare, Stephen J.
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-28T21:47:36Z
dc.date.available2011-04-28T21:47:36Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationStephen J. Ware, What Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration?, 76 University of Cincinnati Law Review 447-457 (2008).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7451
dc.description.abstractThis short piece emphasizes what makes consumer and employment arbitration in the securities industry different from consumer and employment arbitration generally. Securities law imposes non-contractual duties to arbitrate on both broker-dealers and securities employees. I believe these laws are bad policy because they restrict contractual freedom. I conclude that securities arbitration should be contractual, like other arbitration.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cincinnati College of Law
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1118125
dc.subjectArbitration
dc.subjectSecurities law
dc.titleWhat Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration?
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorWare, Stephen J.
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record