Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWare, Stephen J.
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-28T21:47:36Z
dc.date.available2011-04-28T21:47:36Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationStephen J. Ware, What Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration?, 76 University of Cincinnati Law Review 447-457 (2008).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/7451
dc.description.abstractThis short piece emphasizes what makes consumer and employment arbitration in the securities industry different from consumer and employment arbitration generally. Securities law imposes non-contractual duties to arbitrate on both broker-dealers and securities employees. I believe these laws are bad policy because they restrict contractual freedom. I conclude that securities arbitration should be contractual, like other arbitration.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cincinnati College of Law
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1118125
dc.subjectArbitration
dc.subjectSecurities law
dc.titleWhat Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration?
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorWare, Stephen J.
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record