Toward a technology of generalization: The identification of natural contingencies of reinforcement
View/ Open
Issue Date
1986Author
Kohler, Frank W.
Greenwood, Charles R.
Publisher
Assn for Behavior Analysis
Format
1923946 bytes
Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Describes and illustrates 5 forms of evidence useful for demonstrating the existence and function of behavioral traps. Although past researchers have noted a need to program for the generalization and maintenance of behavior change, the current understanding of behavioral traps precludes the use of these contingencies to support behavioral changes when interventions are not in operation. The 5 forms of evidence useful for the identification and analysis of natural contingencies of reinforcement are a demonstration of generalization, maintenance of behavior over time, temporal covariation between a behavior and peer stimuli, functional analysis of peer social stimuli, and systematic replication. Examples from the applied research literature are provided to illustrate the kinds of studies that would enhance knowledge of behavioral traps and improve ability to understand and program the generalization of trained behaviors across diverse forms and settings and over time.
Description
behavioral traps as contingencies of reinforcement, behavior change
Collections
Citation
Kohler, Frank W; Greenwood, Charles R. Behavior-Analyst. Spr 1986 9(1): 19-26.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.