ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhala, Raj
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-02T21:51:57Z
dc.date.available2010-09-02T21:51:57Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationRaj Bhala, Teaching China GATT, 1 Trade Law & Development 1-55 (2009)
dc.identifier.issn0976-2329
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/6608
dc.description.abstractHow would China fare in its first WTO case? That question has been of interest to international trade law practitioners and scholars ever since China acceded to the WTO on 11 December 2001, and indeed even before then, in the years leading up to its accession. The answer now exists. China lost, and lost rather thoroughly, in the 2009 Auto Parts case. However, its loss is a lesson to China, and indeed all WTO Members, about important GATT principles, and indeed about the Golden Rule. Further, for China, and the world, the Auto Parts litigation leads to broader and deeper questions about the nature and extent of economic and political reforms.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNational Law University
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www.tradelawdevelopment.com/index.php/tld/article/viewFile/1%281%29%20TL%26D%201%20%282009%29/3
dc.titleTeaching China GATT
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorBhala, Raj
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record