| dc.contributor.author | Innocenti, Beth | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-27T17:29:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-04-27T17:29:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Manolescu, Beth Innocenti. "Shaming in and into Argumentation." Argumentation 21 (2007): 379-95. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/6171 | |
| dc.description | This is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Shame appeals may be both relevant to and make possible argumentation with reluctant addressees. I propose a normative pragmatic model of practical reasoning involved in shame appeals and show that its explanatory power exceeds that of a more traditional account of an underlying practical inference structure. I also illustrate that analyzing the formal propriety of shame appeals offers a more complete explanation of their normative pragmatic force than an application of rules for dialogue types. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | |
| dc.title | Shaming in and into Argumentation | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| kusw.kuauthor | Innocenti, Beth | |
| kusw.kudepartment | Communication Studies | |
| kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
| kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | |
| kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
