dc.contributor.author | Innocenti, Beth | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-27T15:33:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-27T15:33:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Manolescu, Beth Innocenti. “Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm.” Argumentation 18 (2004): 113-25. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/6169 | |
dc.description | This is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com. | |
dc.description.abstract | Given the persistent conception of rhetoric as effective persuasion by any means for individual success, it is desirable to describe an alternative standard for evaluating argumentation from a rhetorical perspective. I submit formal propriety as a key norm. Conceiving of form as a process of expectation and fulfillment offers a method of reconstructing argumentation that is both descriptive and normative. I illustrate the method by critiquing a sample of argumentation, and conclude by addressing the strengths and limitations of this analytical approach. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://www.springerlink.com/content/x32m6t71t7042733/fulltext.pdf | |
dc.title | Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Innocenti, Beth | |
kusw.kudepartment | Communication Studies | |
kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |