| dc.contributor.author | Belanger, Yale D. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-26T16:15:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-01-26T16:15:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2001-09-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Indigenous Nations Journal, Volume 2, Number 2 (Fall, 2001), pp. 15-35 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/5772 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Writing Native history has traditionally conformed to traditional methodological approaches. This essay argues that inherent differences in the ways Native and non-Native cultures view the past directly impact the production of histories focused on Native populations. With this point in mind, the second half of this essay presents a methodology entitled "Guided History," which not only allows for community input in the production of local histories but also actively promotes this participation. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Global Indigenous Nations Studies Program, University of Kansas: http://www.indigenous.ku.edu | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) Indigenous Nations Journal. For rights questions please contact the Global Indigenous Nations Studies Program, 1410 Jayhawk Blvd, 6 Lippincott Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 | |
| dc.title | Epistemological Distinctiveness and the Use of "Guided History" Methodology for Writing Native Histories | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
