| dc.contributor.author | Sutherland, David Earl | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-05-19T18:06:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-05-19T18:06:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1970-04-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kansas Journal of Sociology, Volume 6, Number 1 (SPRING, 1970), pp. 37-56 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4704 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/4704 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The primary focal point of this paper is an investigation into the significance, if any , of the idea of conflict in two "classical" sociologists-Emile DurkheIm (1958-1917) and Max Weber (1964-1920). Although both developed sociology par excellence in their respective countries and were contemporaneous, neither seemed conscious of the other--they worked separately. The analysis of conflict comprises an exercise in comparative theoretical annlysis. The first problem, then, wi~l be to present a framework for comparing Durkheim and Weber. After a brief comment on the " times" in which they wrote, we move to an examination of conflict in first Durkheim End then Weber. The peper will end with a comparison and conclusion. | |
| dc.description.uri | http://web.ku.edu/~starjrnl | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Department of Sociology, University of Kansas | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045. | |
| dc.title | CONCEPTUAL NEEDLES IN THEORETICAL HAYSTACKS: THE NOTION OF CONFLICT IN DURKHEIM AND WEBER | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.17161/STR.1808.4704 | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
