CONCEPTUAL NEEDLES IN THEORETICAL HAYSTACKS: THE NOTION OF CONFLICT IN DURKHEIM AND WEBER

View/ Open
Issue Date
1970-04-01Author
Sutherland, David Earl
Publisher
Department of Sociology, University of Kansas
Type
Article
Rights
Copyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The primary focal point of this paper is an investigation into the significance, if any , of the idea of conflict in two "classical" sociologists-Emile DurkheIm (1958-1917) and Max Weber (1964-1920). Although both developed sociology par excellence in their respective countries and were contemporaneous, neither seemed conscious of the other--they worked separately. The analysis of conflict comprises an exercise in comparative theoretical annlysis. The first problem, then, wi~l be to present a framework for comparing Durkheim and Weber. After a brief comment on the " times" in which they wrote, we move to an examination of conflict in first Durkheim End then Weber. The peper will end with a comparison and conclusion.
Collections
Citation
Kansas Journal of Sociology, Volume 6, Number 1 (SPRING, 1970), pp. 37-56 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4704
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.