dc.contributor.author | Subhalaxmi Chidambaram, Vrinda | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-22T18:34:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-03-22T18:34:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Slovenski jezik / Slovene Linguistic Studies (6): 287-301) http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/SLS.1808.4407 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/4407 | |
dc.description.abstract | Avtorica raziskuje raznovrstne oziralne stavke v slovenšcini s posebnim ozirom na strukturo, ki se tradicionalno obravnava kot izjemna glede na to, da je v njej neskladje med številom v naslonskem
zaimku in številom v odnosnici, npr. Najboljši iskalec si, [RC kar smo jih imeli.] Razprava kaže, kako sodobna generativna skladnja lahko reši ta problem, in sicer z dvema možnima rešitvama.The author explores the various types of relative clauses in Slovene, focusing on a construction
that has traditionally been assumed to be a special type of relative clause in which there seems to be a mismatch between the number feature of the clitic pronoun and that of the relative head, e.g., Najboljši iskalec si, [RC kar smo jih imeli.]1 best-Nom.sg.masc. seeker-Nom.sg.masc. BE-2nd.
sg.pres. that BE-1st.pl.pres. 3rd.pl.acc.pron have-L-participle ‘You are the best seeker that we have
had (them).’ The paper illustrates how contemporary generative syntax can handle the problem of this feature mismatch, giving two possible solutions. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša; Hall Center for the Humanities, University of Kansas | |
dc.subject | syntax | |
dc.subject | relative clauses | |
dc.subject | Slovene language | |
dc.subject | Slovenian language | |
dc.title | Relative and Pseudo-Relative Clauses in Slovene | |
dc.title.alternative | Pravi in nepravi oziralni stavki v slovenščini | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17161/SLS.1808.4407 | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |