ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcAlpine-Bellis, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorUtsumi, Kaera L.
dc.contributor.authorDiamond, Kelly M.
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Janine
dc.contributor.authorGilbert-Smith, Sophia
dc.contributor.authorGarrison, Grace E.
dc.contributor.authorEifler, Maria A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T20:34:17Z
dc.date.available2024-05-20T20:34:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-10
dc.identifier.citationMcAlpine-Bellis E, Utsumi KL, Diamond KM, Klein J, Gilbert-Smith S, Garrison GE, Eifler MA, Eifler DA. Movement patterns and habitat use for the sympatric species: Gambelia wislizenii and Aspidoscelis tigris. Ecol Evol. 2023 Aug 10;13(8):e10422. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10422. PMID: 37575589; PMCID: PMC10413956en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/35052
dc.description.abstractMovement is an important characteristic of an animal's ecology, reflecting the perception of and response to environmental conditions. To effectively search for food, movement patterns likely depend on habitat characteristics and the sensory systems used to find prey. We examined movements associated with foraging for two sympatric species of lizards inhabiting the Great Basin Desert of southeastern Oregon. The two species have largely overlapping diets but find prey via different sensory cues, which link to their differing foraging strategies—the long‐nosed leopard lizard, Gambelia wislizenii, is a visually‐oriented predator, while the western whiptail, Aspidoscelis tigris, relies more heavily on chemosensory cues to find prey. Using detailed focal observations, we characterized the habitat use and movement paths of each species. We placed markers at the location of focal animals every minute for the duration of each 30‐min observation. Afterward, we recorded whether each location was in the open or in vegetation, as well as the movement metrics of step length, path length, net displacement, straightness index, and turn angle, and then made statistical comparisons between the two species. The visual forager spent more time in open areas, moved less frequently over shorter distances, and differed in patterns of plant use compared to the chemosensory forager. Path characteristics of step length and turn angle differed between species. The visual predator moved in a way that was consistent with the notion that they require a clear visual path to stalk prey whereas the movement of the chemosensory predator increased their chances of detecting prey by venturing further into vegetation. Sympatric species can partition limited resources through differences in search behavior and habitat use.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Open Accessen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectGreat Basin Deserten_US
dc.subjectPath segmentationen_US
dc.subjectResource partitioningen_US
dc.subjectSearch behavioren_US
dc.subjectSensory ecologyen_US
dc.titleMovement patterns and habitat use for the sympatric species: Gambelia wislizenii and Aspidoscelis tigrisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorUtsumi, Kaera L.
kusw.kudepartmentBiodiversity Instituteen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002%2Fece3.10422
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-6907en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5935-7299en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-6795en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-0670en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-0613-7614en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7373-8423en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-4318en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC10413956en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.