ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLequesne, Remy
dc.contributor.authorRulon, Ryan J
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-11T19:08:49Z
dc.date.available2023-06-11T19:08:49Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-31
dc.date.submitted2021
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18085
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/34313
dc.description.abstractUse of large bars is advantageous in large structures like nuclear power plants. Nevertheless, ACI 318-19 prohibits tension lap splices for bars larger than No. 11 [36 mm] because limited test data are available. Eleven large-scale reinforced concrete beams with tension lap splices were tested under monotonically increasing four-point bending until failure to support design provisions for large diameter bars (No. 14 and 18 [43 and 57 mm]). Specimens had different amounts of transverse reinforcement, nominal concrete compressive strengths of 5 or 10 ksi [35 or 69 MPa], and target bar stresses at splice failure of 60 and 100 ksi [420 to 690 MPa] for No. 14 [43 mm] bars and 60 ksi [420 MPa] for No. 18 [57 mm] bars.Test results show that lap splices of No. 14 [43 mm] bars can develop bar stresses up to 100 ksi [690 MPa] and that lap splices of No. 18 [57 mm] bars can develop bar stresses up to at least 60 ksi [420 MPa]. These limits reflect the scope of the text matrix, as there was no indication that higher bar stresses cannot be attained. Analyses showed that both the ACI 408R-03 and ACI 318-19 equations for lap splice lengths become less conservative as bar size increases. This trend was apparent when comparisons were made using prior test results between groups of specimens with No. 6 [19 mm] and smaller bars, No. 7 to No. 10 [22 to 32 mm] bars, No. 11 [36 mm] bars, and bars larger than No. 11 [36 mm]. Two methods are proposed for modifying ACI 408R-03 and ACI 318-19 development length equations to obtain similar levels of conservatism across all bar sizes: a bar size factor (1.15 for No. 11 [36 mm] bars and 1.25 for larger bars) in the numerator of the development length equations or an increased exponent on the bar diameter term (replacing d_b with d_b^1.35 in ACI 408R-03 and d_b^1.25 in ACI 318-19). A minimum clear cover of one bar diameter is recommended for all lap splices. Transverse reinforcement should also be required throughout lap splices of No. 14 and 18 [43 and 57 mm] bars, as even small quantities (K_tr/d_b= 0.5) tended to reduce size effect. Other analyses showed that increasing the limit on ((c_b+K_tr)/d_b ) in the ACI 318-19 development length provisions from 2.5 to 3.5 results in similar conservatism for all amounts of confinement. It is also recommended that development length l_d be limited to 50db when designing unconfined lap splices.
dc.format.extent129 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectCivil engineering
dc.subjectbar stress
dc.subjecthigh-strength steel
dc.subjectlap splice
dc.subjectlarge bars
dc.subjectreinforced concrete
dc.subjecttransverse reinforcement
dc.titleLap Splicing of Large High-Strength Steel Reinforcing Bars
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberDarwin, David
dc.contributor.cmtememberLepage, Andres
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineCivil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.S.
dc.identifier.orcid
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record