Terminograpic Criticism: Structural subdivisions and the terminological field of metalanguage
View/ Open
Issue Date
2021-09-12Author
Oleksijivna Petrova, Tetjana
Publisher
University of Maribor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Published Version
https://journals.um.si/index.php/slaviacentralis/article/view/1264Rights
Copyright (c) 2021 University of Maribor Press. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Članek preučuje strukturo terminografske kritike kot neodvisnega znanstvenega področja. Ugotovljeno je, da je terminografska kritika hierarhično sistematizirano področje znanja, ki je sestavljeno iz (1) teorije in zgodovine terminografske kritike ter (2) prakse terminografske kritike. Terminografska kritika tesno sodeluje z različnimi znanostmi, oblikuje se na podlagi sistema njihovega znanja. Modelirana struktura metajezika terminološkega polja terminografske kritike priča o oblikovanju njegovega pojmovnega aparata. Njeno terminološko polje določajo naslednje ravni: makropolje je terminografska kritika, organizirata pa ga dve terminološki mikropolji – teorija, zgodovina terminografske kritike in praksa terminografske kritike, ki zapolnjujeta ustrezne terminološko-semantične skupine. Pojmovno jedro terminološkega polja metajezika terminografske kritike tvorijo njegovi osnovni termini.The article deals with the structure of terminographic criticism as an independent scientific direction. It is found that terminographic criticism is a hierarchically systematised subject area which integrates two sections: 1) the theory and history of terminographic criticism, 2) the practice of terminographic criticism. Terminographic criticism closely interacts with different sciences and is formed on the basis of the system of their qualitative knowledge. The simulated structure of the metalanguage terminological field of the terminographic critisism proves the formation of its conceptual apparatus. The following levels define its terminological field: the macrofield is “the terminographic criticism”, which is organised by two terminological microfields – “the theory and history of terminographic criticism” and “the practice of terminographic criticism” which constitute correspondent terminological and semantic groups. The conceptual core of the terminological field of the metalanguage terminographic criticism is formed by its basic terms.
Collections
Citation
Oleksijivna Petrova T. (2021). Terminograpic Criticism: Structural subdivisions and the terminological field of metalanguage. Slavia Centralis, 14(1), 111–122. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/slaviacentralis/article/view/1264
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.