So You Discovered a Potential Glycan-Based Biomarker; Now What? We Developed a High-Throughput Method for Quantitative Clinical Glycan Biomarker Validation

View/ Open
Issue Date
2020-03-18Author
Shipman, Joshua T.
Nguyen, Hanna T.
Desaire, Heather
Publisher
American Chemical Society
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Rights
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Glycomic-based approaches to discover potential biomarkers have shown great promise in their ability to distinguish between healthy and diseased individuals; these methods can identify when aberrant glycosylation is significant, but they cannot practically be adapted into widely implemented diagnostic assays because they are too complex, expensive, and low-throughput. We have developed a new strategy that addresses challenges associated with sample preparation, sample throughput, instrumentation needs, and data analysis to transfer the valuable knowledge provided by protein glycosylation into a clinical environment. Notably, the detection limits of the assay are in the single-digit picomole range. Proof of principle is demonstrated by quantifying the changes in the sialic acid content in fetuin. As the sialic acid content in proteins varies in a number of disease states, this example demonstrates the utility of the method for biomarker analysis. Furthermore, the developed method can be adapted to other biologically important saccharides, affording a broad array of quantitative glycomic analyses that are accessible in a high-throughput, plate-reader format. These studies enable glycomic-based biomarker discovery efforts to transition through the difficult landscape of developing a potential biomarker into a clinical assay.
Collections
Citation
Joshua T. Shipman, Hanna T. Nguyen, and Heather Desaire. ACS Omega 2020 5 (12), 6270-6276. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03334
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.