Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQiao, Huijie
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Xiao
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, Luis E.
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, A. Townsend
dc.contributor.authorSoberón, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Gengping
dc.contributor.authorPapeş, Monica
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-07T19:51:25Z
dc.date.available2021-01-07T19:51:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-18
dc.identifier.citationQiao, H., Feng, X., Escobar, L.E., Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., Zhu, G. and Papeş, M. (2019), An evaluation of transferability of ecological niche models. Ecography, 42: 521-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03986en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/31055
dc.description.abstractEcological niche modeling (ENM) is used widely to study species’ geographic distributions. ENM applications frequently involve transferring models calibrated with environmental data from one region to other regions or times that may include novel environmental conditions. When novel conditions are present, transferability implies extrapolation, whereas, in absence of such conditions, transferability is an interpolation step only. We evaluated transferability of models produced using 11 ENM algorithms from the perspective of interpolation and extrapolation in a virtual species framework. We defined fundamental niches and potential distributions of 16 virtual species distributed across Eurasia. To simulate real situations of incomplete understanding of species’ distribution or existing fundamental niche (environmental conditions suitable for the species contained in the study area; N* F ), we divided Eurasia into six regions and used 1–5 regions for model calibration and the rest for model evaluation. The models produced with the 11 ENM algorithms were evaluated in environmental space, to complement the traditional geographic evaluation of models. None of the algorithms accurately estimated the existing fundamental niche (N* F ) given one region in calibration, and model evaluation scores decreased as the novelty of the environments in the evaluation regions increased. Thus, we recommend quantifying environmental similarity between calibration and transfer regions prior to model transfer, providing an avenue for assessing uncertainty of model transferability. Different algorithms had different sensitivity to completeness of knowledge of N* F , with implications for algorithm selection. If the goal is to reconstruct fundamental niches, users should choose algorithms with limited extrapolation when N* F is well known, or choose algorithms with increased extrapolation when N* F is poorly known. Our assessment can inform applications of ecological niche modeling transference to anticipate species invasions into novel areas, disease emergence in new regions, and forecasts of species distributions under future climate conditions.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Open Accessen_US
dc.rights© 2018 The Authors. Ecography © 2018 Nordic Society Oikos.en_US
dc.subjectExtrapolationen_US
dc.subjectInterpolationen_US
dc.subjectNon-analog environmenten_US
dc.titleAn evaluation of transferability of ecological niche modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorPeterson, A. Townsend
kusw.kuauthorSoberón, Jorge
kusw.kuauthorZhu, Gengping
kusw.kudepartmentEcology & Evolutionary Biologyen_US
kusw.kudepartmentKU Biodiversity Instituteen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ecog.03986en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-6234en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-3927en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0243-2379en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record