Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Pankaj Narayan
dc.contributor.authorHarley, Amber
dc.contributor.authorPendergrass, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorDarwin, David
dc.contributor.authorBrowning, JoAnn
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T22:43:00Z
dc.date.available2018-11-15T22:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2013-05
dc.identifier.citationShrestha, P., Harley, A., Pendergrass, B., Darwin, D. and Browning. J., “Use of Innovative Concrete Mixes for Improved Constructability and Sustainability of Bridge Decks, 2010-2013,” SL Report 13-3, University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas, May 2013, 100 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/27377
dc.description.abstractBridge deck crack surveys were performed on twelve bridges on US-59 south of Lawrence, KS to determine the effects of mixture proportions, concrete properties, deck type, and girder type on the crack density of reinforced concrete bridge decks. Of the twelve decks surveyed, eight are supported by prestressed concrete girders and four are supported by steel girders. Four of the decks supported by prestressed girders are cast on partial-depth precast deck panels, two are monolithic with synthetic fibers, and two have overlays. Of the four decks supported by steel girders, two have silica fume overlays (SFO) and two are monolithic. One of two decks with a silica fume overlay contains synthetic fibers in the overlay. Following the surveys, crack maps were plotted and analyzed and cracking trends were observed. The results for the US-59 bridge decks are compared with crack densities obtained in a study of low-cracking high-performance concrete (LC-HPC) bridge decks. The monolithic concrete bridge decks supported by prestressed concrete girders within this study exhibit less cracking than decks supported by steel girders. At an age of approximately three and a half years, the US-59 monolithic decks supported by prestressed girders with deck panels are not displaying significant cracking; most of the cracks are short transverse cracks aligned with the joints between the deck panels. The US-59 decks supported by prestressed girders with overlays exhibit significantly more cracking than the decks on prestressed girders without overlays. Bridge decks supported by steel girders without overlays have slightly higher crack densities than the decks with overlays. No benefits of using fibers in either the overlay or deck have been observed in this study, the sample size, however, is small. An increase in crack density was observed with an increase in average concrete slump for decks supported by both prestressed and steel girders. Decks with deck panels supported by prestressed girders exhibited an increased crack density with an increase in paste content.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSL Report;13-3
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://iri.ku.edu/reportsen_US
dc.subjectBridge decksen_US
dc.subjectHigh-performance concreteen_US
dc.subjectCrackingen_US
dc.subjectFibersen_US
dc.titleUse of Innovative Concrete Mixes for Improved Constructability and Sustainability of Bridge Decks, 2010-2013en_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
kusw.kudepartmentInfrastructure Research Instituteen_US
kusw.oastatusna
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record