Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAshraf, Uzma
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, A. Townsend
dc.contributor.authorChaudhry, Muhammad Nawaz
dc.contributor.authorAshraf, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorSaqib, Zafeer
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Sajid Rashid
dc.contributor.authorAli, Hassan
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T21:28:37Z
dc.date.available2018-11-14T21:28:37Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-19
dc.identifier.citationAshraf, U., A. T. Peterson, M. N. Chaudhry, I. Ashraf, Z. Saqib, S. Rashid Ahmad, and H. Ali. 2017. Ecological niche model comparison under different climate scenarios: a case study of Olea spp. in Asia. Ecosphere 8(5):e01825.10.1002/ecs2.1825en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/27356
dc.description.abstractEcological niche modeling (and the related species distribution modeling) has been used as a tool with which to assess potential impacts of climate change processes on geographic distributions of species. However, the factors introducing variation into niche modeling outcomes are not well understood: To this end, we used seven algorithms to develop models (Maxent, GARP, BIOCLIM, artificial neural networks, support‐vector machines, climate envelope, and environmental distance) to estimate the potential geographic distribution of olives (Olea europaea sensu lato, including Olea ferruginea) under two climatic data sets (current 2000 and future 2050). Five general circulation models and two representative concentration pathway scenarios were used as predictor variables in future projections of the geographic potential of this species; models were fit at global extents (10′ spatial resolution) but transferred and interpreted for a region of particular interest in Central Asia, which largely avoids problems with truncation of niche estimates. We found marked differences among approaches in predicted distributions and model performance, as well as in the future distributional pattern reconstructed, from one algorithm to another. These general approaches, when model‐to‐model variation is managed appropriately, appear promising in predicting the potential geographic distribution of O. europaea sensu lato and thus can be an effective tool in restoration and conservation planning for wild populations, as well as possible commercial plantations of this species.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Ashraf et al. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectEcological niche modelen_US
dc.subjectInvasive speciesen_US
dc.subjectPartial receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)en_US
dc.subjectSpecies distribution modelen_US
dc.titleEcological niche model comparison under different climate scenarios: a case study of Olea spp. in Asiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorPeterson, A. Townsend
kusw.kudepartmentEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecs2.1825en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 Ashraf et al.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2017 Ashraf et al. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.