Intercomparison of snow depth retrievals over Arctic sea ice from radar data acquired by Operation IceBridge

View/ Open
Issue Date
2017-11Author
Kwok, Ron
Kurtz, Nathan T.
Brucker, Ludovic
Ivanoff, Alvaro
Newman, Thomas
Farrel, Sinead L.
King, Joshua
Howell, Stephen
Webster, Melinda A.
Paden, John
Leuschen, Carl J.
MacGregor, Joseph A.
Richter-Menge, Jacqueline
Harbeck, Jeremy
Tschudi, Mark
Publisher
European Geosciences Union
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Rights
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Since 2009, the ultra-wideband snow radar on Operation IceBridge (OIB; a NASA airborne mission to survey the polar ice covers) has acquired data in annual campaigns conducted during the Arctic and Antarctic springs. Progressive improvements in radar hardware and data processing methodologies have led to improved data quality for subsequent retrieval of snow depth. Existing retrieval algorithms differ in the way the air–snow (a–s) and snow–ice (s–i) interfaces are detected and localized in the radar returns and in how the system limitations are addressed (e.g., noise, resolution). In 2014, the Snow Thickness On Sea Ice Working Group (STOSIWG) was formed and tasked with investigating how radar data quality affects snow depth retrievals and how retrievals from the various algorithms differ. The goal is to understand the limitations of the estimates and to produce a well-documented, long-term record that can be used for understanding broader changes in the Arctic climate system. Here, we assess five retrieval algorithms by comparisons with field measurements from two ground-based campaigns, including the BRomine, Ozone, and Mercury EXperiment (BROMEX) at Barrow, Alaska; a field program by Environment and Climate Change Canada at Eureka, Nunavut; and available climatology and snowfall from ERA-Interim reanalysis. The aim is to examine available algorithms and to use the assessment results to inform the development of future approaches. We present results from these assessments and highlight key considerations for the production of a long-term, calibrated geophysical record of springtime snow thickness over Arctic sea ice.
Collections
Citation
Kwok, R., Kurtz, N. T., Brucker, L., Ivanoff, A., Newman, T., Farrell, S. L., King, J., Howell, S., Webster, M. A., Paden, J., Leuschen, C., MacGregor, J. A., Richter-Menge, J., Harbeck, J., and Tschudi, M.: Intercomparison of snow depth retrievals over Arctic sea ice from radar data acquired by Operation IceBridge, The Cryosphere, 11, 2571-2593, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2571-2017, 2017.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.