Corrosion Performance of Plain and Epoxy-Coated MMFX Bars

View/ Open
Issue Date
2018-10Author
Farshadfar, Omid
O’Reilly, Matthew
Darwin, David
Publisher
University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.
Type
Technical Report
Is part of series
SL Report;18-4
Published Version
https://iri.ku.edu/reportsMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The corrosion resistance of ASTM A1035 Type CL (2% Cr), CM (4% Cr), and CS (9% Cr) steel bars produced by MMFX Technologies were evaluated in both cracked and uncracked concrete as well as in the rapid macrocell test. Uncoated bars with 4% and 9% chromium were tested both in the condition received and after pickling at the University of Kansas; coated bars with 2% and 4% chromium were also evaluated after simulating damage typical to that which would occur during normal handling and placement at a construction site. Bars were compared to the performance of conventional (ASTM A615) and epoxy-coated (ASTM A775) reinforcement from previous studies, and a life-cycle cost analysis over a 75-year design life was performed. The uncoated MMFX bars with 4% and 9% chromium exhibited approximately three times the chloride threshold and between 30-66% of the corrosion rate of uncoated conventional reinforcement, with the 9% chromium bars exhibiting better performance than the 4% chromium bars. Pickling of 9% chromium bars significantly improved its corrosion resistance, while pickling the 4% chromium bars provided only mild benefit. Both epoxy-coated bars tested (2% and 4% chromium) exhibited reduced disbondment of the coating at the end of testing compared to conventional epoxy-coated reinforcement. The 4% chromium coated bars also exhibited significantly lower corrosion rates relative to conventional epoxy-coated reinforcement, with corrosion rates between 15 and 30% of that of conventional ECR. Coated bars with 2% chromium performed comparably or slightly better than conventional epoxy-coated reinforcement (depending on the test method), but the differences were not statistically significant. The life-cycle cost analysis found that epoxy-coated MMFX with 4% chromium was the most cost-effective reinforcement of the bars in this study.
Collections
Citation
Farshadfar, O., O’Reilly, M., and Darwin, D., “Corrosion Performance of Plain and Epoxy-Coated MMFX Bars,” SL Report 18-4, University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, KS, October 2018, 114 pp.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.