Better to Give than to Receive: An Uncommon Commons in Synthetic Biology
View/ Open
Issue Date
2017Author
Torrance, Andrew W.
Type
Book chapter
Version
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3135317
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The emerging scientific field of synthetic biology offers an array of technical and scientific approaches new to the biological sciences. In addition, the community of scientists leading synthetic biology tends to agree on an ethos of openness and collaboration that marks a departure from the previous proprietary norm predominant in biology. While traditional biologists have long relied upon the patent system to protect and foster commercialization of their inventions, the synthetic biology community has tended to promote the very different ethos of open innovation and has created knowledge commons governance institutions to support that ethos. In fact, many in the field suspect patents of chilling research and believe that patenting ought to be avoided. Instead, many synthetic biologists prefer to contribute the new strands of DNA that they create to a commons, whose contents are available to all. This chapter first provides some background on the field of synthetic biology. It next describes some of the institutions that synthetic biologists have put in place to create and maintain a synthetic biology commons. It then shares the first empirical evidence from synthetic biology that in the synthetic biology commons, giving behavior is overwhelmingly more frequent than taking behavior. In other words, instead of being dominated by free riders, the synthetic biology knowledge commons appears to offer free rides.
Collections
Citation
Torrance, Andrew W., Better to Give than to Receive: An Uncommon Commons in Synthetic Biology, in Governing Medical Knowledge Commons, 192-221 (Katherine J. Strandburg, Brett M. Frischmann, & Michael J. Madison, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 3135317.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Patent Expertise and the Regress of Useful Arts
Tomlinson, Bill; Torrance, Andrew W. (Southern Illinois University School of Law, 2009)Employing a multi-user interactive simulation of patent and non-patent (commons and open source) systems (the "Patent Game"), this study compares empirical data on rates of innovation, productivity, and social utility ... -
Patents and the Regress of Useful Arts
Tomlinson, Bill; Torrance, Andrew W. (Columbia Law School, 2009)Patent systems are often justified by an assumption that innovation will be spurred by the prospect of patent protection, leading to the accrual of greater societal benefits than would be possible under non-patent systems. ... -
Synthesizing Law for Synthetic Biology
Torrance, Andrew W. (University of Minnesota Law School, 2010)In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech more than half a century ago, Edward L. Tatum suggested an ambitious new goal for biology: "not only to avoid structural and metabolic errors in the developing organism, but also to ...