Conventional and High-Strength Hooked Bars: Detailing Effects

View/ Open
Issue Date
2018-01-01Author
Sperry, Jayne
Darwin, David
O’Reilly, Matthew
Lepage, Andrés
Lequesne, Rémy D.
Matamoros, Adolfo B.
Feldman, Lisa
Yasso, Samir
Searle, Nathaniel
DeRubeis, Michael
Ajaam, Ali Hussein
Publisher
American Concrete Institute
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Published Version
https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal.aspx?m=details&ID=51700920Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Findings from a study on the effect of hook bend angle, concrete clear cover, and orientation of confining reinforcement on hook anchorage strength are presented. The range of test parameters was much broader than in previous studies. Bar stress at anchorage failure ranged from 33,000 to 137,400 psi (228 to 947 MPa) and concrete compressive strengths ranged from 4300 to 16,500 psi (30 to 114 MPa). Anchorage strength of hooked bars was insensitive to bend angle (90 or 180 degrees) and side cover (between 2.5 and 3.5 in. [65 and 90 mm]). Confining reinforcement was found to increase anchorage strength for 180-degree hooked bars regardless of orientation (parallel or perpendicular to the embedment length). For 90-degree hooked bars, reinforcement oriented parallel to the embedment length had a greater effect on anchorage strength than reinforcement oriented perpendicular to the embedment length.
Collections
Citation
Sperry, J. Darwin, D. O'Reilly, M. Lepage, A. Lequesne, R. D., Matamoros, A. Feldman, L. Yasso, S. Searle, N. DeRubeis, M. & Ajaam, A. (2018). Conventional and High-Strength Steel Hooked Bars: Detailing Effects. ACI Structural Journal, 115(1), 248-258.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.