ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSis, Hadley
dc.contributor.authorMannen, Erin Mychael
dc.contributor.authorWong, Benjamin Michael
dc.contributor.authorCadel, Eileen Sara
dc.contributor.authorBouxsein, Mary L.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Dennis E.
dc.contributor.authorFriis, Elizabeth A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-31T17:29:59Z
dc.date.available2018-01-31T17:29:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-03
dc.identifier.citationSis, H. L., Mannen, E. M., Wong, B. M., Cadel, E. S., Bouxsein, M. L., Anderson, D. E., & Friis, E. A. (2016). Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage. Journal of biomechanics, 49(14), 3252-3259.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/25853
dc.description.abstractResearchers have reported on the importance of the rib cage in maintaining mechanical stability in the thoracic spine and on the validity of a compressive follower preload. However, dynamic mechanical testing using both the rib cage and follower load has never been studied. An in vitro biomechanical study of human cadaveric thoracic specimens with rib cage intact in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under varying compressive follower preloads was performed. The objective was to characterize the motion and stiffness of the thoracic spine with intact rib cage and follower preload. The hypotheses tested for all modes of bending were (i) range of motion, elastic zone, and neutral zone will be reduced with a follower load, and (ii) neutral and elastic zone stiffness will be increased with a follower load. Eight human cadaveric thoracic spine specimen (T1-T12) with intact rib cage were subjected to 5 Nm pure moments in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under follower loads of 0 to 400 N. Range of motion, elastic and neutral zones, and elastic and neutral zone stiffness values were calculated for functional spinal units and segments within the entire thoracic section. Combined segmental range of motion decreased by an average of 34% with follower load for every mode. Application of a follower load with intact rib cage impacts the motion and stiffness of the human cadaveric thoracic spine. Researchers should consider including both aspects to better represent the physiologic implications of human motion and improve clinically relevant biomechanical thoracic spine testing.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectThoracic Spineen_US
dc.subjectRib Cageen_US
dc.subjectFollower Loaden_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.titleEffect of Follower Load on Motion and Stiffness of the Human Thoracic Spine with Intact Rib Cageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorSis, Hadley
kusw.kudepartmentBioengineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.08.003en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.