Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHan, Jie
dc.contributor.authorSong, S.
dc.contributor.authorXu, C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-06T19:55:09Z
dc.date.available2017-12-06T19:55:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifier.citationXu, C., Song, S., & Han, J. (2015). Scaled model tests on influence factors of full geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments. Geosynthetics International, 23(2), 140-153.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/25591
dc.description.abstractA geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankment that consists of embankment fill, geosynthetic, piles, and foundation soils is a complex soil–structure system. Its key load transfer mechanisms include soil arching and tensioned membrane effects and subsoil resistance. Type of embankment fill (cohesive or cohesionless) and type of pile (end-bearing or floating) are expected to affect these load transfer mechanisms; however, their influence has not been well investigated. Six scaled model tests were conducted in this study to investigate the influence of the embankment fill properties, the clear spacing of pile caps, and the pile type on soil arching and tensioned membrane effects. This study used cohesive and cohesionless embankment fills and end-bearing and floating piles. The test results show that the cohesive embankment fill strengthened the soil-arching effect, increased the pile efficacy, and reduced the settlements of the subsoil between pile caps and the embankment crest under the same load as compared with the cohesionless embankment fill. The soil arching-effect was inversely proportional to the clear spacing of pile caps. Soil arching initiated at a low ratio of the embankment height to the clear spacing of pile caps (i.e. 0.5 to 0.7) and became stable at a higher ratio (i.e. 1.1 to 1.5). The embankment height when the soil arching becomes stable is also referred to as the critical height, at which full soil arching is formed. The measured vertical earth pressures at the edges of the pile caps were higher than those in the middle of the pile caps in all six model tests. When the end-bearing or floating piles were used, the loads on the piles (i.e. the pile efficacy) increased during the construction of the embankment. However, when the floating piles started to penetrate into the underlying soil under a higher load; the pile efficacy decreased with the embankment and the surcharge load. Floating piles resulted in less soil arching and larger settlement.en_US
dc.publisherThomas Telforden_US
dc.rightsCopyright © ICE Publishing 2016en_US
dc.subjectGeosyntheticsen_US
dc.subjectEarth pressureen_US
dc.subjectEmbankmenten_US
dc.subjectPileen_US
dc.subjectSettlementen_US
dc.subjectSoil archingen_US
dc.subjectTensioned membraneen_US
dc.titleScaled model tests on influence factors of full geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorHan, Jie
kusw.kudepartmentCivil, Environmental & Architectural Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1680/jgein.15.00038en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record