ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhala, Raj
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-13T19:09:47Z
dc.date.available2017-03-13T19:09:47Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.citation29 Geo. Wash. J. Int'l L. & Econ. 1 (1995-1996)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/23401
dc.description.abstractTariffs no longer matter in international trade law. Between 1947, when the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) entered into force, and 1994, the eve of the entry into force of the Uruguay Round agreements, average tariffs in industrial countries plunged from 40% to 6.3%. As a result of the Uruguay Round, that average will fall to just 3.9% and the percentage of industrial products (by value) that receive duty-free treatment will rise from 20% to 43%. Nontariff barriers are what matter in late twentieth and early twenty-first century international trade law, leaving protectionists with few remaining weapons to achieve their goals.en_US
dc.publisherGeorge Washing Journal of Law & Economicsen_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2916733en_US
dc.subjectTariffsen_US
dc.subjectGATTen_US
dc.subjectUruguay Rounden_US
dc.titleRethinking Antidumping Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorBhala, Raj
kusw.kudepartmentLawen_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record