KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Labor Impacts of the Enforcement of the Clean Water Act

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Raff_ku_0099D_14819_DATA_1.pdf (1.489Mb)
    Issue Date
    2016-08-31
    Author
    Raff, Zach
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    164 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Economics
    Rights
    Copyright held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This dissertation is the collection of three papers that each examines a specific labor impact of the enforcement of the Clean Water Act. The chapters of the dissertation all use panel data from a unique survey of chemical manufacturing facilities operating between 1999 and 2001 to empirically examine how environmental enforcement policy affects the use of employees at regulated firms, specifically those employees whose job functions pertain to environmental management. The first chapter explores the effects of enforcement on the amount of environmental labor employed by facilities regulated under the U.S. Clean Water Act. Specifically, the analysis examines the influence of monitoring inspections and enforcement actions, e.g., fines, on the number of employees allocated to environmental management. Empirical results show that environmental enforcement negatively affects the amount of environmental labor allocated by the sampled facilities. Specifically, federal inspections, informal enforcement actions, and monetary fines each negatively affect environmental employment. The second chapter adds to the first by examining the influence of the overall environmental enforcement approach, contrasting a potentially innovative cooperative approach with the standard coercive approach, on the effects of government interventions on corporate environmental management, specifically environmental employment. The results show that the effectiveness of enforcement at inducing better environmental management depends on the overall regulatory enforcement approach. Controlling for various facility-level characteristics, I find that greater cooperation undermines enforcement effectiveness. As one example, monetary penalties positively affect the amount of environmental labor under a sufficiently coercive approach, yet negatively under a sufficiently cooperative approach. These results show that a cooperative enforcement approach is ineffective at best and counter-productive at worst, while a coercive approach is generally effective. Rather than cooperation representing an innovative policy, cooperation may simply reflect regulatory capture. The third chapter examines the overall employment effects of environmental enforcement. To generate contributions, the study assesses various forms of enforcement, which include both government monitoring inspections and actual enforcement actions. The study first estimates effects of government interventions on total employment, consistent with previous empirical studies. Then the study jointly estimates a system of two equations – one for environmental labor and one for production labor – to identify the different effects of government interventions on environmental workers and production workers. Overall, the empirical results reveal that government interventions have a zero or negative effect on total employment. More important, the empirical results generally demonstrate that government interventions have a zero or positive effect on environmental employment, yet a zero or negative effect on production employment, consistent with the constructed theoretical framework. Thus, all previous labor studies, which examine only total employment, most likely generate results that support incomplete, if not misleading, conclusions.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/22476
    Collections
    • Dissertations [4474]
    • Economics Dissertations and Theses [169]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps