ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDorsey, Dale
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-13T17:08:20Z
dc.date.available2016-12-13T17:08:20Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.identifier.citationDorsey, D. (2015). Objectivity and Perfection in Hume’s Hedonism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 53(2), 245-270. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved December 2, 2016, from Project MUSE database.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/22187
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I investigate David Hume’s theory of well-being or prudential value. That Hume was some sort of hedonist is typically taken for granted in discussions of his value theory, but I argue that Hume was a hedonist of pathbreaking sophistication. His hedonism intriguingly blends traditional hedonism with a form of perfectionism yielding a version of qualitative hedonism that not only solves puzzles surrounding Hume’s moral theory, but is interesting and important in its own right.en_US
dc.publisherJohn Hopkins University Pressen_US
dc.subjectHumeen_US
dc.subjectHedonismen_US
dc.subjectPerfectionismen_US
dc.subjectWell-beingen_US
dc.subjectPrudential valueen_US
dc.titleObjectivity and Perfection in Hume's Hedonismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorDorsey, Dale
kusw.kudepartmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1353/hph.2015.0028en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record