Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, Tony R.
dc.contributor.authorDarwin, David
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-04T20:04:20Z
dc.date.available2016-03-04T20:04:20Z
dc.date.issued1995-04
dc.identifier.citationSchmitt, T.R., and Darwin, D., "Cracking in Concrete Bridge Decks," SM Report No. 39, University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, KS, April 1995, 164 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/20444
dc.description.abstractThe causes of cracking in concrete bridge decks are investigated, and procedures are recommended to alleviate the problem. Forty continuous steel girder bridges, thirty-seven composite and three noncomposite, from northeast Kansas (KDOT District I) are evaluated. Field surveys conducted to document cracking patterns and to determine the crack density of each bridge are described. Information collected from construction documents, field books, and weather data logs is presented and compared to the observed levels of cracking to identify correlations between cracking and the variables studied. Thirty-one variables are considered. These include material properties, site conditions, construction procedures, and design specifications, as well as age and traffic volume. Based on the research reported herein, cracking in monolithic bridge decks increases with increasing values of concrete slump, percent volume of water and cement, water content, cement content, and compressive strength, and decreasing values of air content (especially below 6.0% ). Bridge deck overlays placed with zero slump concrete exhibit consistently high levels of cracking. Cracking in overlays also increases as placement lengths increase. High maximum air temperatures and large changes in air temperature on the day of casting aggravate cracking in monolithic bridge decks. High average air temperatures and large changes in air temperature similarly aggravate cracking in bridge deck overlays. Both monolithic and two-layer bridges with fixed-ended girders exhibit increased cracking near the abutments compared to those with pin-ended girders.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSM Report;39
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://iri.ku.edu/reportsen_US
dc.subjectBridge decksen_US
dc.subjectBridge constructionen_US
dc.subjectConcrete constructionen_US
dc.subjectConcrete mix designen_US
dc.subjectCrackingen_US
dc.subjectDurabilityen_US
dc.subjectOverlayen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concreteen_US
dc.subjectShrinkageen_US
dc.titleCracking in Concrete Bridge Decksen_US
dc.typeTechnical Report
kusw.kuauthorDarwin, David
kusw.kudepartmentCivil/Environ/Arch Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-3525
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record