Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDarwin, David
dc.contributor.authorKahrs, Jason T.
dc.contributor.authorLocke, Carl E., Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-01T19:38:30Z
dc.date.available2016-03-01T19:38:30Z
dc.date.issued2002-09
dc.identifier.citationDarwin, D., Kahrs, J. T., Locke, C.E., Jr., "Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance of Type 304 Stainless Steel Clad Reinforcing Bars," The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, September 2002, 91 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/20424
dc.descriptionThis is report number FHWA-KS-02-3.
dc.description.abstractThe corrosion performance of a prototype 304 stainless steel clad reinforcing bar and conventional reinforcing steel is compared based on corrosion potential and macrocell corrosion tests. Tests are conducted on bare bars and bars symmetrically embedded in a mortar cylinder. Test specimens consist of bars with ends protected with epoxy or with plastic caps filled with epoxy, and clad bars with a hole drilled through the cladding. Specimens are exposed to a simulated concrete pore solution with a 1.6 molal ion concentration of sodium chloride. Additional corrosion potential tests include specimens exposed to simulated concrete pore solution with and without pressurized air pumped into the solution and a conventional bar with a reduced thickness of mortar cover. Additional macrocell corrosion tests include sandblasted stainless steel clad bars, damaged stainless steel specimens connected to conventional steel cathodes, mortar covered conventional bars connected to bare ·conventional bars, and specimens with a reduced thickness of mortar. The thickness and uniformity of the stainless steel cladding is evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. The results indicate the prototype 304 stainless steel clad reinforcement exhibits superior corrosion resistance compared to conventional reinforcing steel, but requires adequate protection at cut ends, where the mild steel core is not covered by cladding. For bare stainless steel clad bars, the macrocell corrosion rate varies between 0.0 to 0.3 μm/yr (0.0 to 0.012 mpy), about 11100 of the value observed for conventional bars. Stainless steel bars embedded in mortar exhibit corrosion rates between 0.0 and 0.2 μm/yr (0.0 and 0.008 mpy), averaging 1120 to 'lso of the value exhibited by conventional bars. The corrosion rates for clad bars with a drilled hole through the cladding range between 0.0 and 0.75 μrn/yr (0.0 and 0.03 rnpy), averaging about 1170 of the value exhibited by conventional steel bars. The thickness of the stamless steel cladding on bars in the current study varies between 0.196 to 0.894 mm (7.7 to 35 mils). Imperfections m the form of an indentation in the base material and a crack in the cladding material filling the indention were observed. The crack did not penetrate the stainless steel cladding and cladding is of adequate thickness to protect the mild steel core. Longer-term tests are recommended, as is use of the bar in demonstration bridge decks.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://iri.ku.edu/reportsen_US
dc.subjectChloridesen_US
dc.subjectClad reinforcementen_US
dc.subjectConcreteen_US
dc.subjectCorrosionen_US
dc.subjectMacrocellen_US
dc.subjectPotentialen_US
dc.subjectReinforcing barsen_US
dc.subjectType 304 stainless steelen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Corrosion Resistance of Type 304 Stainless Steel Clad Reinforcing Barsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Report
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-3525
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record