Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHadje-Ghaffari, Hossain
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Oan Chul
dc.contributor.authorDarwin, David
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, Steven L.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-22T20:34:20Z
dc.date.available2016-02-22T20:34:20Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.citationHadje-Ghaffari, H., Choi, O.C., Darwin, D., and McCabe, S.L., "Bond of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement to Concrete: Cover, Casting Position, Slump, and Consolidation," Research Grant No. ECE-8616228, SL Report 92-3, The National Science Foundation, June 1992, 45 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/20329
dc.description.abstractThe effects of concrete cover, casting position, concrete slump, and degree of consolidation on the reduction in bond strength between reinforcing bars and concrete caused by epoxy coating are described. Tests include beam-end specimens containing No. 5, No. 6, No. 8, and No. 11 bars. Bottom-cast and top-cast bars with 1, 2, or 3 bar diameters of cover are evaluated. Concrete slump ranges from 21/4 to 8 in. Some specimens containing high slump concrete are not vibrated. The results of the study are used to develop improved development length modification factors for epoxy-coated bars. Epoxy coatings significantly reduce bond strength. However, the extent of the reduction is less than used to select the development length modification factors in the 1989 ACI Building Code and the 1989 AASHTO Bridge Specifications for bars with cover < 3 bar diameters or a clear spacing < 6 bar diameters. The development length modification factor can be reduced from 1.5 to 1.35 for these bars. The relative bond strength of epoxy-coated reinforcement increases as cover increases. In most cases, the bond strength of coated bars exceeds the bond strength of uncoated bars that have one bar diameter less cover. As a result, the current provisions of ACI 318-89 are realistic as they are applied to epoxy-coated bars with a cover :2: 3 bar diameters and a clear spacing :2: 6 bar diameters. However, the provisions of the 1989 AASHTO Bridge Specifications are somewhat unconservative for these bars and should be modified. The ratio of bond strength of bottom-cast bars to the bond strength of top-cast bars, B/T, is about the same for coated and uncoated bars cast in low slump concrete. The ratio increases significantly for uncoated bars and decreases slightly for coated bars as slump increases. The results indicate that the upper limit on the product of the epoxy-coating factor and the top-bar factor can be reduced from 1.7 to 1.5. A lack of vibration has a negative effect on the bond strength of both coated and uncoated reinforcement in high slump concrete. This is the fifth in a series of reports describing research at the University of Kansas on epoxy-coated reinforcement The research is aimed at gaining a better understanding of the bond of epoxy-coated reinforcement to concrete and developing design procedures that accurately reflect the changes in bond strength caused by epoxy coating.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSL Report;92-3
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://iri.ku.edu/reportsen_US
dc.subjectBond (reinforcement to concrete)en_US
dc.subjectCoatingsen_US
dc.subjectDeformed reinforcementen_US
dc.subjectEpoxy-coated reinforcementen_US
dc.subjectPullout testsen_US
dc.subjectReinforcing steelsen_US
dc.subjectStructural engineeringen_US
dc.titleBond of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement Concrete: Cover, Casting Position, Slump, and Consolidationen_US
dc.typeTechnical Report
kusw.kuauthorDarwin, David
kusw.kudepartmentCivil/Environ/Arch Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-3525
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record