Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStorkel, Holly L.
dc.contributor.authorMaekawa, Junko
dc.contributor.authorHoover, Jill R.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T21:11:26Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T21:11:26Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationStorkel, Holly L., Junko Maekawa, and Jill R. Hoover. "Differentiating the Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Vocabulary Comprehension and Production: A Comparison of Preschool Children With Versus Without Phonological Delays." J Speech Lang Hear Res Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 53.4 (2010): 933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0075).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/19917
dc.descriptionThis is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid=1781591en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose

The purpose of this study was to differentiate the effect of phonotactic probability from that of neighborhood density on a vocabulary probe administered to preschool children with or without a phonological delay.

Method

Twenty preschool children with functional phonological delays and 34 preschool children with typical language development completed a 121 item vocabulary probe in both an expressive and receptive response format. Words on the vocabulary probe orthogonally varied on phonotactic probability and neighborhood density but were matched on age-of-acquisition, word frequency, word length, semantic set size, concreteness, familiarity, and imagability.

Results

Results showed an interaction between phonotactic probability and neighborhood density with variation across groups. Specifically, the optimal conditions for typically developing children were rare phonotactic probability with sparse neighborhoods and common phonotactic probability with dense neighborhoods. In contrast, only rare phonotactic probability with sparse neighborhoods was optimal for children with phonological delays.

Conclusions

Rare sound sequences and sparse neighborhoods may facilitate triggering of word learning for typically developing children and children with phonological delays. In contrast, common sound sequences and dense neighborhoods may facilitate configuration and engagement for typically developing children but not children with phonological delays due to their weaker phonological and/or lexical representations.
en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Associationen_US
dc.subjectWord learningen_US
dc.subjectVocabularyen_US
dc.subjectNeighbourhood densityen_US
dc.subjectPhonotactic probabilityen_US
dc.subjectPhonological delayen_US
dc.titleDifferentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: A comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delaysen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorStorkel, Holly L.
kusw.kuauthorMaekawa, Junko
kusw.kudepartmentSpeech-Language-Hearingen_US
kusw.kudepartmentBureau of Child Researchen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0075)
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record