ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarley, Amber
dc.contributor.authorDarwin, David
dc.contributor.authorBrowning, JoAnn
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-29T20:49:37Z
dc.date.available2016-01-29T20:49:37Z
dc.date.issued2011-12
dc.identifier.citationHarley, A., Darwin, D., and Browning, J.P., "Use of Innovative Concrete Mixes for Improved Constructability and Sustainability of Bridge Decks 2010-2011," SL Report 11-5, University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas, December 2011, 82 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/19831
dc.description.abstractBridge deck crack surveys were performed on twelve bridges on US-59 to determine the effects of mixture proportions, deck type, and girder types on the crack density of reinforced concrete bridge decks. Of the twelve, eight have prestressed concrete girders and four have steel girders. Four of the decks with prestressed girders have partial-depth precast deck panels, two are monolithic, and two have overlays. Of the four decks with steel girders, two have overlays and two are monolithic. The surveys were performed, crack maps were analyzed, and cracking trends were observed. The results for the US-59 bridge decks were compared with crack densities obtained in a study of low-cracking high-performance concrete (LC-HPC) bridge decks in Kansas. The monolithic concrete bridge decks supported by prestressed concrete girders within this study exhibit less cracking than decks supported by steel girders in the first three years. At an age of approximately three years, the US-59 monolithic decks on prestressed girders with deck panels are not displaying significant cracking at the joints of the panels. The US-59 decks supported by prestressed girders without overlays exhibit significantly less cracking than the decks on prestressed girders with overlays. No benefits of using fibers in either the overlay or in the deck have been observed in this study.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSL Report;11-5
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://iri.ku.edu/reportsen_US
dc.subjectBridge decksen_US
dc.subjectHigh-performance concreteen_US
dc.subjectCrackingen_US
dc.subjectFibersen_US
dc.titleUse of Innovative Concrete Mixes for Improved Constructability and Sustainability of Bridge Decks 2010-2011en_US
dc.typeTechnical Report
kusw.kuauthorDarwin, David
kusw.kudepartmentCivil/Environ/Arch Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-3525
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record