ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMolz, F. J.
dc.contributor.authorMelville, J. G.
dc.contributor.authorGuven, O.
dc.contributor.authorParr, Alfred D.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-17T15:25:37Z
dc.date.available2015-11-17T15:25:37Z
dc.date.issued1983-08
dc.identifier.citationMolz, F. J., J. G. Melville, O. Güven, and A. D. Parr. "Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage: An Attempt to Counter Free Thermal Convection." Water Resources Research Water Resour. Res. 19.4 (1983): 922-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR019i004p00922en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/18924
dc.descriptionThis is the published version. Copyright 1983 American Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.description.abstractIn previous Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) experiments, appreciable free thermal convection was observed. In an attempt to counter the detrimental effects of convection, a dual recovery well system was constructed at the Mobile site and a third injection-storage-recovery cycle performed. Using a partially penetrating well, cycle 3-3 injection began on April 7, 1982. A total of 56,680 m3 of 79°C water were injected. After 57 days of storage, production began with a dual recovery well system. Due to the dominating effect of nonhomogeneities, the dual well system did not work particularly well, and a recovery factor of 0.42 was achieved. The degree of aquifer heterogeneity at the location of the present experiments was not apparent during previous experiments at a location only 109 m away, although pumping tests indicated similar values of transmissivity. Therefore aquifers with the same transmissivity can behave quite differently in a thermal sense. Heat conduction to the upper aquitard was a major energy loss mechanism. Water sample analyses indicated that there were no important changes in the chemical constituents during the third set of experiments. There was a 19% increase in total dissolved solids. At the end of injection, the land surface near the injection well had risen 1.39 cm with respect to bench marks located 70 m away.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.titleAquifer thermal energy storage: An attempt to counter free thermal convectionen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorParr, Alfred D.
kusw.kudepartmentCivil/Environ/Arch Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/WR019i004p00922
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record