Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBohm, Parker E.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Karen K.
dc.contributor.authorFriis, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Paul M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-12T15:33:08Z
dc.date.available2015-11-12T15:33:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-02
dc.identifier.citationArnold, Paulm, Parkere Bohm, Karenk Anderson, and Elizabetha Friis. "Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis and Interspinous Device Placement: Removal in Six Patients and Analysis of Current Data." Surgical Neurology International Surg Neurol Int 6.1 (2015): 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.154461en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/18884
dc.descriptionThis is the published version. Information that is created by or for the US government on this site is within the public domain. Public domain information on the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Web pages may be freely distributed and copied. However, it is requested that in any subsequent use of this work, NLM be given appropriate acknowledgment.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the treatment of patients with Grade 1 spondylolisthesis, the use of interspinous devices has been controversial for nearly a decade. Several authors have suggested that Grade 1 spondylolisthesis be considered a contraindication for interspinous device placement. Methods:

We removed interspinous devices in six symptomatic Grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients and analyzed pertinent literature. Results:

All six patients reported an improvement in symptoms following device removal and subsequent instrumented fusion. One patient who had not been able to walk due to pain regained the ability to walk. Several articles were identified related to spondylolisthesis and interspinous devices. Conclusions:

Regarding patients receiving interspinous devices for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, several high-quality studies have failed to demonstrate a statistical difference in outcomes between patients with or without Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Nevertheless, surgeons should have a high degree of suspicion when considering use of interspinous devices in this patient population.
en_US
dc.publisherMedknow Publicationsen_US
dc.subjectInterspinous process deviceen_US
dc.subjectInterspinous process spaceren_US
dc.subjectLumbar spinal stenosisen_US
dc.subjectNeurogenic intermittent claudicationen_US
dc.subjectSpondylolisthesisen_US
dc.subjectX-STOP®en_US
dc.titleGrade 1 spondylolisthesis and interspinous device placement: removal in six patients and analysis of current dataen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorFriis, Elizabeth A.
kusw.kudepartmentMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/2152-7806.154461
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record